**Edwards Act Sparks Fan Outrage After Kangaroos Injury**

Tecfai Editorial Team

You need 2 min read

·

Post on Oct 29, 2024

57 visitor like this post

Share

Edwards Act Sparks Fan Outrage After Kangaroos Injury

The recent injury to star forward, Liam Edwards, during the Kangaroos vs. Tigers game has ignited a storm of controversy, with fans expressing their outrage over the Edwards Act, a new rule implemented this season.

The Edwards Act, aimed at reducing player injuries, prohibits tackles below the knees and is widely believed to be responsible for Edwards' devastating knee injury. Critics argue that the rule, while intended to protect players, actually creates a more dangerous environment by forcing players to tackle higher, increasing the risk of head and neck injuries.

The Play That Sparked Fury

The incident occurred in the second quarter when Edwards was tackled by Tiger's defender, Mark Taylor, who attempted a high tackle, attempting to avoid the banned low tackle. The impact sent Edwards crashing to the ground, his knee twisting awkwardly. While Taylor was penalized for the high tackle, fans were left questioning the effectiveness and safety of the Edwards Act.

Fan Reactions Flood Social Media

Social media platforms erupted with anger following the incident. #EdwardsActOutrage and #ProtectThePlayers trended globally, with fans voicing their concerns about the rule's impact on the game and players' safety.

"The Edwards Act is a joke," commented one fan on Twitter. "It's supposed to protect players, but it's making the game more dangerous."

Others expressed their frustration with the lack of communication and consultation from the league before implementing the rule.

"The league needs to listen to the fans and players," wrote another fan on Facebook. "This rule is clearly not working."

Calls for Review and Rescission

The Kangaroos, along with several other teams, have publicly voiced their concerns over the Edwards Act and called for a review of the rule. Some are even pushing for its complete rescission, citing the numerous high-profile injuries that have occurred since its implementation.

The league has yet to respond to the growing backlash, but the public pressure is mounting. With fans demanding action, the future of the Edwards Act remains uncertain. Will the league reconsider the rule, or will they continue to enforce it despite the growing concerns? Only time will tell how this controversy will unfold.