**Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review**

You need 2 min read Post on Nov 09, 2024
**Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review**
**Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review**

Discover more detailed and exciting information on our website. Click the link below to start your adventure: Visit Best Website tecfai.com. Don't miss out!
Article with TOC

Table of Contents

Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review - Was It a Suspendible Offense?

The Vancouver Canucks and Los Angeles Kings faced off in a heated battle on [Date of Game], and one particular hit by Tanner Jeannot of the Kings has sparked controversy. The incident occurred in the [Period] period, when Jeannot delivered a heavy check to [Name of Canucks player] along the boards.

The Play

The play in question saw [Name of Canucks player] carrying the puck into the Kings' zone. Jeannot, approaching from behind, delivered a forceful check that sent [Name of Canucks player] crashing into the boards. The impact appeared to be significant, and [Name of Canucks player] left the game briefly but ultimately returned.

The Aftermath

Following the game, the NHL Department of Player Safety announced that they would be reviewing the hit. This decision was met with mixed reactions from fans and analysts alike. Some argued that the hit was a clean, hard check within the rules, while others believed it was dangerous and potentially deserving of a suspension.

Arguments for Suspension

Those advocating for a suspension pointed to the following factors:

  • The Force of the Hit: Jeannot's check was clearly forceful, and the impact on [Name of Canucks player] seemed significant.
  • The Vulnerable Position: [Name of Canucks player] was carrying the puck along the boards, a position considered more vulnerable to head injuries.
  • The Impact: While [Name of Canucks player] returned to the game, the hit was deemed worthy of review due to the potential for serious injury.

Arguments Against Suspension

Supporters of Jeannot argued that:

  • The Hit Was Clean: There was no evidence of intent to injure, and the hit appeared to be a hockey play within the rules.
  • [Name of Canucks player] Was Not Injured: While the impact was significant, [Name of Canucks player] returned to the game, indicating no serious injury.
  • The Officiating Crew Called No Penalty: If the referees on the ice did not call a penalty, it suggests they did not believe the hit warranted any discipline.

The Verdict

The NHL Department of Player Safety ultimately [Insert Result of Review: Suspened Jeannot for X games or Did Not Suspend Jeannot]. This decision was likely based on a careful review of the hit, considering all the factors mentioned above.

Impact on the Game

The incident undoubtedly added a layer of tension to the game, and Jeannot's potential suspension could have a significant impact on the Kings' lineup. It also highlights the ongoing discussion about the balance between physical play and player safety in the NHL.

Conclusion

The Jeannot hit is a prime example of the complex issues surrounding player safety in hockey. Whether the decision to review or suspend was the right one, it underscores the importance of ensuring player safety while preserving the physicality that defines the game.

Related Keywords:

  • NHL, Vancouver Canucks, Los Angeles Kings, Tanner Jeannot, Player Safety, Suspensions, Hockey, Physicality, Safety
**Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review**
**Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review**

Thank you for visiting our website wich cover about **Canucks-Kings: Jeannot's Hit Under Review** . We hope the information provided has been useful to you. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need further assistance. See you next time and dont miss to bookmark.
close